To be honest... I think that there is a lot of work for 1 person, but hardly any for two
people.. If that makes sense?
For example, I could maintain the list and website while Ben organises the monthly meets,
and their content. Anything more could then be a joint thing.
--
Adam
Sent from my mobile device.
----- Original message -----
On 10 May 2011 10:42, Chris Snow <cr.snow(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> A committee feels a bit formal for me unless money becomes involved in
> which case 5 members turning up reliably for meetings is least
> practically needed (from previous experience) 3 of whom would be
> officers; chair, sec and treasurer.
>
> Chris.
>
Perhaps I was wrong in saying the word 'committee'? I don't mean
anything 'formal' as I don't think that is either needed or wanted. I
honestly can't think of another way of putting it but it would be good
to have a few members who 'look after' specific areas of the LUG.
Otherwise, as so often happens, it will all fall onto one person's
shoulders.
--
==============================================
Kevan
Linux user #373362
Staffordshire
**********************************************
www.freeworld-recycling.org
'From me to you towards a sustainable future.'
**********************************************
_______________________________________________
Staffslug mailing list
Staffslug(a)staffslug.org.uk
http://lists.staffslug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/staffslug