Tom,
Do you have a preference between Samsung F3's/WD Black's? Or are they
much the same?
Adam
On 10 November 2010 14:28, Tom <tom(a)ninjabadger.net> wrote:
 On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 07:19 +0000, Andrew Edwards wrote:
>
> WD velociraptor drives aren't that much faster than every other drive
> out there tbh. I'd use my money to set up some samsung F3's in raid 0.
> That is pushing SSD speeds (with 2tb storage...). The F3 is pennies
> now too, so you'd be getting an all round better solution than a
> raptor/velociraptor drive imo...
 Pushing 'SSD' transfer rates, maybe. Some SSDs anyway - depends how much
 you fancy spending.
 The random-request (read or write) speeds of SSDs, particularly with
 recent Sandforce/Intel models, is an order of magnitude better than any
 form of rotating rust.
 Personally I agree with Andrew on the storage/speed/cost front; I don't
 think I'd buy another 'Raptor now, although RPM increases do typically
 come with improved random workload performances, they're nothing like
 the SSD experience. If you can't afford SSD prices, stick with the
 Samsung F3/WD Caviar Black level of disk(s). :)
 _______________________________________________
 Staffslug mailing list
 Staffslug(a)staffslug.org.uk
 
http://lists.staffslug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/staffslug