On 10 May 2011 10:42, Chris Snow <cr.snow(a)gmail.com> wrote:
A committee feels a bit formal for me unless money becomes involved
in which
case 5 members turning up reliably for meetings is least practically needed
(from previous experience) 3 of whom would be officers; chair, sec and
treasurer.
Chris.
Perhaps I was wrong in saying the word 'committee'? I don't mean
anything 'formal' as I don't think that is either needed or wanted. I
honestly can't think of another way of putting it but it would be good
to have a few members who 'look after' specific areas of the LUG.
Otherwise, as so often happens, it will all fall onto one person's
shoulders.
--
==============================================
Kevan
Linux user #373362
Staffordshire
**********************************************
www.freeworld-recycling.org
'From me to you towards a sustainable future.'
**********************************************