Re: [Staffslug] Staffslug featured in latest linux format

what exactly would you like them to big up? not really been any achievements worth celebrating. having the new website mentioned is good enough i reckon > Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:05:41 +0000 > From: cr.snow(a)gmail.com > To: staffslug(a)staffslug.org.uk > Subject: Re: [Staffslug] Staffslug featured in latest linux format > > We should get in touch and ask them to big up the SLUG in one of the > next few issues. > > Chris. > > 2009/3/18 Kevanf1 <kevanf1(a)gmail.com&gt;: > > 2009/3/18 syed ali <simta(a)hotmail.com&gt;: > >> it is a tad expensive, but it is a good magazine. its a difficult > >> catch-22 i > >> think, its a niche market therefore it needs to be pricey to make ends > >> meet > >> but then that price can put off lots of potential buyers. > >> > > > > That's why I subscribe to it and have done for the last 3 yrs.  It > > works out about a couple of quid cheaper.  I'm also pleased to say > > that it is not like some magazines that recycle old articles every 12 > > months or so.  I've found this with fishing magazines in the past so I > > stop subscribing to them then. > > -- > > ============================================== > > > > Kevan Farmer > > Linux user #373362 > > Staffordshire > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Staffslug mailing list > > Staffslug(a)staffslug.org.uk > > http://lists.staffslug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/staffslug > > > > _______________________________________________ > Staffslug mailing list > Staffslug(a)staffslug.org.uk > http://lists.staffslug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/staffslug _______________________________________________ Staffslug mailing list Staffslug(a)staffslug.org.uk http://lists.staffslug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/staffslug