I get that, but most of the time the judges think that Microsoft FrontPage 2000 is a good web design suite.
On 23/07/07, Joe Zambon < joe.zambon@jznet.org.uk> wrote:
> My ultimate, pet hate for websites, is flash. WHAT kind of *!*IDIOT!*!
> decided it would be a good idea to make a website that it takes 10
> minutes to get past some crappy flash intro without an option to skip
> it...then followed by a whole host of animations and transitions that
> take 20 seconds to change between pages...and then...the mother of all
> irritations. Because they setup some internally handled nav system it
> means that the back button on my browser takes me OUT of the site and
> back to their bloody flash intro as opposed to the last page I looked at
> within their site. It /must/ be some God awful attempt to punish me for
> something I've not done yet...possibly the "designer" of that site's
> impending slaughter.
>
Then, just to add salt to the already smarting wounds, you find the
site has won some bloody web building award!!!!!! WHAT????? The
fishing club I am a member of has just this sort of set up and yes
they won an award for it. It's bloody horrible!!!!!
Oh, my other pet hate is where sites are only configured for one
resolution. As is the new Yahoo Mail layout. It's awful with my res'
of 800x600. I don't want to change my resolution, why should I? That
smacks of Microsoft dictatorship :-(
--
==============================================
Kevan Farmer
Linux user #373362
Staffordshire
_______________________________________________
Staffslug mailing list
Staffslug@staffslug.org.uk
http://www.staffslug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/staffslug