On 10/05/11 10:04, Kevanf1 wrote:
On 9 May 2011 22:42, Adam Egan<adam.egan(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't really think we're big enough for a committee...
>
I'm just thinking of a small group of members who have specific
responsibility within the LUG. I just wonder if it would alleviate
any burn out or overload on one or two individuals who end up doing it
all.
Please, discuss...
Perhaps committee is the wrong word, but having a group of people who
help out with certain aspects of the lug is a good idea. We did discuss
this a couple of months ago, and a few of us volunteered to help out
with specific things.
On 09/05/11 23:25, Ben Skan wrote:
I volunteer too. As with Adam I'm not opposed to a coalition.
Would you be Nick Clegg to Adam's David Cameron, or would it be the
other way round? :)