2008/12/20 Frank Mitchell <mitchell(a)wyatt672earp.force9.co.uk>:
Recently I noticed Sun Solaris used CDs with a UFS File System. So I decided
to try UFS and Ext2 on Optical Disks. It should work on CD-RW, but I had
spare DVD+RW disks, so I decided to get more ambitious.
Note that DVDs use 2048-byte Sectors like CDs, but they're handled in
Error-Correcting Blocks of 16. You can't expect DVD-RW to work, because
DVD-RW only writes complete ECC Blocks. But DVD+RW (like DVD-RAM) can
update individual Sectors.
FreeBSD UFS1 wouldn't work this way. The FreeBSD Handbook gives instructions
for DVD-RAM, and obviously DVD-RAM has a different layout. But OpenSUSE Linux
seems okay with Ext2 on DVD+RW. I copied a large Subtree and checked the
result using diff -qr.
Does anybody have thoughts about this idea? Like: Any disadvantages which
haven't occurred to me? Obviously if you're recording Personal Information on
Removable Media it might be preferable to use a format which isn't readable
Faictz Ce Que Vouldras: Frank Mitchell
Is Ext2 journalled or was that Ext3? Just thinking it might wear out
an RW disk faster if a journalled system was used. If Ext2 is not
journalled then why not use it? Unless it is less efficient than UFS?
Sorry answered with more questions...
Linux user #373362