2009/2/4 Kevanf1 <kevanf1(a)gmail.com>
> May I make some proposals?
>
> Firstly, let's appoint a formal LUG Master, a team leader. 12 months
> tenure? Dave? Anybody to second this? Dave do you accept?
>
>
I only want to be involved with democtatic organisations. Assuming we go
for
a structured LUG what are the roles, responsibilities, terms of reference?
What's the decision making process?
Might not be the best idea to rush into anything here.
Chris.
_______________________________________________
Staffslug mailing list
Staffslug(a)staffslug.org.uk
http://lists.staffslug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/staffslug
Chris (and everyone else)
I would always want the LUG to be democratic, the last thing I would want
is for a person to feel that it wasn't the case.
I've just been taking a read of an interesting pdf
(
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/pdf/User-Group-HOWTO.pdf) and it raises some
interesting points about the structure of the lug. (worth a look)
What I was thinking about for some sort of structure would be something like:
i. Team of say 3-5 people that look after content on the site, where
people could pass stuff to them, so we can get a consistent look and feel
to content.
ii. Any number of people to say what they feel they have strengths in,
which we could put up on the site, so we can have our Guru's (or as near
as!) on stuff
iii. If we *should* have a forum have x number of people to look over the
board (I have to say, that I do find them easier to use if looking for
help info etc, but that's just my opinion, but mailing list are excellent
too)
What do you think?
Dave