Chris (and everyone else) I would always want the LUG to be democratic, the last thing I would want is for a person to feel that it wasn't the case. I've just been taking a read of an interesting pdf (http://tldp.org/HOWTO/pdf/User-Group-HOWTO.pdf) and it raises some interesting points about the structure of the lug. (worth a look) What I was thinking about for some sort of structure would be something like: i. Team of say 3-5 people that look after content on the site, where people could pass stuff to them, so we can get a consistent look and feel to content. ii. Any number of people to say what they feel they have strengths in, which we could put up on the site, so we can have our Guru's (or as near as!) on stuff iii. If we *should* have a forum have x number of people to look over the board (I have to say, that I do find them easier to use if looking for help info etc, but that's just my opinion, but mailing list are excellent too) What do you think? Dave

I propose that we: 1. Establish what the aims of the LUG are and what we want to achieve. 2. Bearing that in mind, agree a structure (which might be completely informal, who knows?) 3. Decide on people to fill roles. 4. Put meat on the bones. Decide how to meet our aims. What are we going to do and how are we going to do it. small undertaking! 1 & 2 would take some hours, Chris.