On 16/03/07, Ben Whyte <ben(a)whyte-systems.co.uk> wrote:
> Unless anyone else out there has a 20+ year history of motorsport
> and street cars in the order of 600hp I'll demand the final say on
> this one.
> There was never an accident caused by a road, a minute number due to
> mechanical failure(10 yr test/Mot waste of money), speed is not a
> meaningful factor (they hit each other all day long in London at an
> average speed of 8mph)
> Accidents are the proof positive of the total morons that our society
> allows behind the wheel.
> Mway limits? 100 min 180 max - if you don't like it you can use the A road.
> Our driving test is a joke, if I ran the system there'd be no more
> traffic problems 'cos the number of drivers would be reduced by 90% !
> You're not looking at "drivers" out there, but people moving cars - a
> big difference.
> I could rant forever on this subject
> Stuart
Wow, off topic or what?
Only 90%, I have a fundamental belief that over 95% of the
population
should not be allowed out at all, let alone behind the wheel of any form
of vehicle, neither should they be allowed credit cards, money or any
sharp objects. ie council estates being the first to get all the new
gadgets, we cant afford clothes or food but we can drink and smoke.
Council estates? Do you mean "satellite dish city" 45 quid a month for
football and moronic movies all paid for by the rest of us idiots?
The government has to spend a huge amount of its time legislating
for
stupid dumb people, who should instead be celebrated for removing them
selves from the gene pool.
It is my sincere belief that the up side of global warming ( if it's
a real phenomenon) will, in time, ensure the survival of the fittest.
In todays world that means the most technologically able. That should
improve the average IQ of the gene pool.
Stuart.
Ben